Internationalization of
the Western Universities
Objective:
Bowen (2012) defines “glocalization” as adapting a global product to fit local
customs and needs. “For example, McDonald’s is a global company known for the
consistency of its products, but in India it offers mostly chicken, lamb, and
vegetarian food.” He then suggests in education, there is a need to localize
the material and internationalize the product (e.g., New York University in Abu
Dhabi). The objective of this journal is to critically discuss why major
universities have become internationalized and how they take advantage of new
technology to integrate active learning among student and faculty remotely.
Reflective:
In my perspective, internationalization
of higher education is a great service to humanity in the long run as long as
it’s not profit motivated. I like Bowen’s argument on the significant role of
universities “at integrating the human and personal significance of content,
enhancing the human intellectual curiosity, increasing personal
investment in the material, negotiating difference, and connecting information
across disciplines.” (p. 285) Unfortunately, the decreasing financial support
from the federal and provincial governments has forced many universities to compete
at the global level for private donors to cover costly expenses, including updating
or expanding their facilities.
Traditionally, many students from developing
countries located themselves in Western countries to gain knowledge and skills,
and the expectation was for them to return to their home countries and advance their
societies. While Canadian universities still admit thousands of international students,
technological tools have made it possible for many other students to stay in
their home countries and graduate from the same universities. In this case,
those graduating from the University of British Columbia remotely don’t incur the
high cost of living in Vancouver and mainly pay tuition fees and course related
expenses.
Interpretive:
The concept of Internationalization is
not a foreign concept to many of us, particularly since the increasing pace of globalization
in the world market and trade economy. “Internationalization describes the
voluntary and perhaps creative ways of coping (Altbach, 2004:3).” The process of internationalization of higher
education involves voluntary interaction between individuals (students, faculty
and staff) and between nations across borders.
Internationalization of higher education creates opportunities for
education partnerships with governments and nations, academic institutions at
the global level, non-governmental organizations, businesses, faculty and
students, and diverse Canadian and global communities.
Although I agree with Bowen that universities
need to change their approaches and strategies in this era of globalization to
become global universities, in recent years, advancements in technology have
made it much easier for educational institutions and universities to offer
distance education and on-line education to students and scholars who may
study, work and live anywhere in the world.
Currently, distance education and on-line education is more popular in
the fields of business, management and technology to middle class international
students whose parents have money and who study and work in their home
countries and receive their degrees from foreign universities. This has been reported in the Vancouver Sun article
“The Chinese connection”:
The number of students in China packing their bags to study
in Canada is dropping, but that isn’t stopping many of them from getting a
Canadian education. Faced with declining
numbers of international students seeking admission to programs here, Canadian
institutions have been putting more emphasis on creative partnerships that deliver
Canadian curriculum-seen as an advantage in a globalized economy-to students in
China. (2005, E1)
As argued by Bowen, the focus of universities that market
their service at the global level should be on motivating students to learn and
to “…find new ways to connect with students.” (p. 288)
As discussed, the integration of national markets into a global
market has pushed the administrations of many Canadian universities to internationalize
their campuses and to maximize revenue from international students. Faced with increased cuts to education budgets
at both provincial and federal levels since the early 1990s, many university
administrations have been forced to accept funding from multinational
companies, particularly for their science and technology departments. Whether this new direction for Western
universities puts quality of education ahead of profits or whether it’s beneficial
for the survival of the universities is beyond the scope of this journal, my concern
is whether educators are using opportunities offered by “glocalization” to
create quality, effective education that is very accessible, interactive,
inclusive, supportive and promotes active learning.
Decisional
Educational institutions need to
encourage interactive relationships between students, faculty and staff to
motivate participation of all groups in the design and delivery of
international programs. If I have some
kind of decision making power in higher education at the global level, I will
not force my way of thinking on anyone, including nations considered
‘financially poor’, but instead create equal opportunities for collaborative
sharing and exchange of knowledge/skills with the aim of improving the quality
of life for people worldwide.
As our experience has shown, in
recent years, many educational institutions are pushed into privatizing
departments and programs. In my perspective, individual students, staff and
faculty members can make a big difference in moving campuses toward being
inclusive, supportive, caring and passionate in rising to the challenge of
making the world more humane and livable for everyone by transforming our
institutions into needed societal leaders and role models.
The opportunities provided by the new
technology have allowed all students to share their knowledge, expertise and related
experiences with a broader audience at the global level. This course has encouraged me to think more about
the concept and practices of higher education in this fast growing era of
technological advances in every aspect of our lives. In this era of a knowledge economy, educators need
to create and implement curricula that are relevant locally and internationally.
In this context, “glocalization” of
education motivates me to create a curriculum that will meet the demands of the
international community and meet the needs of local and remote learners. Therefore,
my aim will be to share my knowledge and skills to make the world better for
all humanity.
References
Altbach,
Philip. (2004). ‘Globalization and the University: Myths and Realities in an Unequal
World’. Tertiary Education and
Management (No. 1, 2001). Centre for
International Higher Education, Campion Hall, Boston College, Chestnut.
Bowen, J. A. (2012). Teaching Naked: How Moving Technology Out of Your College Classroom
Will Imp
Shaw,
Gillian. (2005). ‘International program
widens horizons for students in B.C. and Asia: The Chinese connection’. Monday, March 14, 2005. E1, Vancouver Sun.
No comments:
Post a Comment